Penggunaan Nama Tiktok pada Aplikasi Tiktok Cash Secara Melawan Hukum Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik dan Peraturan Pelaksanaanya
Main Article Content
Tort against the use of the application name in the Tiktok Cash application is one of the negative impacts of information technology-oriented social and economic activities. This study aims to find the legal responsibility of Tiktok Cash as the administrator of the electronic system operator and government responsibility. The approach method used in this study is the normative juridical research method approach with descriptive-analytical research specifications, mainly describing the laws and regulations associated with legal theories related to the problem of using the name Tiktok in the Tiktok Cash application. The results of the study concluded that the actions carried out by Tiktok Cash application were tort acts stipulated in Article 28 paragraph (1) EIT LAW. In line with Article 15 EIT LAW, Tiktok Cash provider is fault liability for the loss of its users, while the celebrities involved are responsible based on the element of limitation of liability. Furthermore, the form of government responsibility for the practice of using application names is by carrying out cyber patrols and blocking as stipulated in Article 40 of the EIT LAW and Article 97 paragraph (2) Government Regulation No. 71 Year 2019.
Astria, N. (2019). Essay Kajian Kronologis Dan Dampak Penggunaan Dan Perkembangan Teknologi Informasi. Jurnal Inovasi, 13(1), 1–10. Https://Doi.Org/10.33557/Jurnalinovasi.V13i1.606
Cahyono, A. S. (2016). Pengaruh Media Sosial Terhadap Perubahan Sosial Masyarakat Di Indonesia. Publiciana, 9(1), 140–157. Https://Doi.Org/10.36563/Publiciana.V9i1.79
Cholik, C. A. (2021). Perkembangan Teknologi Informasi Komunikasi/Ict Dalam Berbagai Bidang. Jurnal Fakultas Teknik Kuningan, 2(2), 39–46. Https://Jurnal.Unisa.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Jft/Article/View/83
Dewa, C. B., & Safitri, L. A. (2021). Pemanfaatan Media Sosial Tiktok Sebagai Media Promosi Industri Kuliner Di Yogyakarta Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 (Studi Kasus Akun Tiktok Javafoodie). Khasanah Ilmu-Jurnal Pariwisata Dan Budaya, 12(1), 65–71. Https://Doi.Org/10.31294/Khi.V12i1.10132
Fanaqi, C. (2021). Tiktok Sebagai Media Kreativitas Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Dakwah: Media Komunikasi Dan Dakwah, 22(1), 105–130. Https://Doi.Org/10.14421/Jd.22.1.21.4
Febriyantoro, M. T., & Arisandi, D. (2018). Pemanfaatan Digital Marketing Bagi Usaha Mikro, Kecil Dan Menengah Pada Era Masyarakat Ekonomi Asean. Jmd: Jurnal Riset Manajemen & Bisnis Dewantara, 1(2), 61–76. Https://Doi.Org/10.26533/Jmd.V1i2.175
Muchfian, K. (2022). Kewenangan Kemenkominfo Dalam Memblokir Akses Konten Asusila Di Media Sosial Twitter. Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim. Http://Etheses.Uin-Malang.Ac.Id/38699/
Nursandi, T. R. (2021). Perlindungan Konsumen Atas Pengguna Aplikasi Tiktok Cash. Upn" Veteran’jawa Timur. Http://Repository.Upnjatim.Ac.Id/3615/
Pratiwi, P. S., Seytawati, M. P., Hidayatullah, A. F., Ismail, I., & Tafsir, T. (2021). Moderasi Beragama Dan Media Sosial (Studi Analisis Konten Instagram & Tik-Tok). Jurnal Dakwah Dan Komunikasi, 6(1), 83–94. Https://Doi.Org/10.29240/Jdk.V6i1.2959
Rafiq, A. (2020). Dampak Media Sosial Terhadap Perubahan Sosial Suatu Masyarakat. Global Komunika, 1(1), 18–29. Https://Core.Ac.Uk/Download/Pdf/327205602.Pdf
Tan, C., & Kornelis, Y. (2022). Tinjauan Yuridis Atas Tindakan Cyberbullying Terhadap Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konten Kreator Pada Aplikasi Tiktok. Gorontalo Law Review, 5(1), 52–62. Https://Doi.Org/10.32662/Golrev.V5i1.2032
R, Agus. (2002). Cybercrime (Pemahaman dan Upaya Pencegahan Kejahatan Berteknologi). Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakri
Muhamad Amirulloh. (2016). Hukum Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi (TIK) Sebagai Hukum Positif Dalam Perkembangan Masyarakat Global. Bandung: Unpad Press
Maskun dan Saloko, Wiwik Meilarati. (2017). Aspek Hukum Penipuan Berbasis Internet. Bandung: CV Keni Media
